Thursday, January 5, 2012

U. S. Coast Guard Notice of Policy Re the Manila Amendments, Hours of Rest and Security-Related Training

On December 4, 2011, the U.S. Coast Guard posted a notice of policy in the Federal Register, announcing steps for Implementation of the 2010 Amendments to the International Convention on Standards of Training, Certification and Watchkeeping for Seafarers, 1978—Hours of Rest and Security-Related Training. The security related training portion is reproduced below, followed by some commentary on keeping current.

Security Training Requirements

The STCW Convention requires that mariners who commenced service after 1 January 2012 meet the training requirements for vessel personnel with designated security duties and security awareness, as appropriate. In addition, the STCW Convention also provides transitional provisions for mariners who started service prior to 1 January 2012. Recognizing that the implementation date is fast approaching, and that there may be practical difficulties for all seafarers with security related requirements to obtain necessary certifications and/or the necessary endorsements required in accordance with regulation VI/6 of the 2010 Manila Amendments, the IMO issued Circular STCW.7/Circ.17. The Circular provides advice for port State control officers on transitional arrangements leading up to full implementation of the 2010 Manila Amendments on 1 January 2017. The Circular also recommends that Administrations inform their port State control authorities that, until 1 January 2014, it would be sufficient to accept compliance with section 13 of the International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code, even if a seafarer's documentation with regard to the security-related training in regulation VI/6 is not in accordance with the 2010 Manila Amendments.

Taking the information in the Circular into account, the Coast Guard has determined that the requirements in 33 CFR 104.220 (vessel personnel with security duties) and 104.225 (security training for all other personnel) meet the requirements of Section 13 of the ISPS Code. Therefore, the Coast Guard will continue to enforce 33 CFR 104.220 and 104.225, and the requirements in Section 13 of the ISPS Code.

Vessels operating in foreign ports should ensure that all personnel, except for the vessel security officer (VSOs), working on board the vessel are in possession of the appropriate course completion certificate or a company letter as proof of meeting the requirements in 33 CFR 104.220 or 104.225, and Section 13 of the ISPS Code. VSOs must hold the appropriate endorsement on their credential.

This notice is issued under authority of 5 U.S.C. 552(a), 46 U.S.C. 8304, 33 CFR part 104, 46 CFR parts 10, 11, 12, and 15, and 33 CFR 1.05-1.

Dated: December 28, 2011.

J.G. Lantz,

Director of Commercial Regulations and Standards, U.S. Coast Guard.

[FR Doc. 2011-33818 Filed 12-30-11; 4:15 pm]

_______________________________________________________

For more information about the Manila Amendments, see http://www.imo.org/ourwork/humanelement/trainingcertification/documents/34.pdf if you want to read the whole text and http://www.marisec.org/quickguide.htm.pdf if you want a digest.

________________________________________________________

The U. S. Coast Guard uses several instruments (NVIC’s, Policy Advisory Council decisions, policy letters and announcements) to adopt and promulgate major changes to the our industry. The regulatory process is cumbersome and the agency is years behind in its regulatory schedule, so these more agile instruments fill a needed role. The problem is, how do we keep updated to the flow of information?

Here’s some websites that should be checked on a daily basis:

  • The Federal Register - to sign up for the Table of Contents of the next days’ FR, go to http://listserv.access.gpo.gov/
  • Dennis Bryant’s Maritime Blog, (best of the best, ‘way ahead of the rest of us) http://brymar-consulting.com/

USCG Issues Policy on Processing of Merchant Mariner Credentials for Mariners Not Requiring a Transportation Worker Identification Credential

December 23, 2011

Policy on Processing of Merchant Mariner Credentials for Mariners Not Requiring a Transportation Worker Identification Credential

The Coast Guard has released Policy Letter 11-15 which describes the process it intends to follow in implementing Section 809 of the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-281), which modified the requirement that all mariners obtain a Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC) in order to be issued a Merchant Mariner Credential (MMC). Although full implementation of Section 809 may require regulatory changes, this policy letter implements two policy mechanisms that will allow the Coast Guard to begin to implement the intent of the Act while working on the final regulatory solution:

 Enforcement.

 Credentialing Processes.

The Coast Guard has interpreted the act to exempt Merchant Mariners who are not serving on vessels required to have a Vessel Security Plan (VSP) from the requirement to hold a valid TWIC. However, in order for the Coast Guard to process a credential application, we must have received the applicant’s biographical information from the Transportation Security Administration; must have completed the TWIC enrollment process at least one time. Additionally, in order for the Coast Guard to process a credential application for a mariner who is not in possession of a valid TWIC, the mariner must submit a statement indicating an understanding of the possible delays associated with processing the safety and suitability check and certifying that they do not require a TWIC in accordance with the Policy Letter. For specific information please see:

 Policy Letter 11-15 can be found at:

http://www.uscg.mil/nmc/marpers/pag/twic_809_policy_letter.pdf

 Federal Register Link can be viewed by going to http://www.regulations.gov, inserting USCG-2011-0465 in the “Keyword” box, and then clicking “Search.”.

 A Sample Statement of Certification and Understanding can be found at:

http://www.uscg.mil/nmc/twic/sample_b.pdf.

Should you require additional information or assistance, please contact the NMC by email at IASKNMC@uscg.mil or by phone at 1-888-IASKNMC.

Sincerely,

/A. S. Lloyd/

Anthony S. Lloyd

Captain, U. S. Coast Guard

Commanding Officer

Monday, December 26, 2011

U. S. Coast Guard Policy Letter Issued December 19, 2011, Regarding Merchant Mariners who may be Excluded from TWIC Requirements

Below is the complete text of the U. S. Coast Guard policy letter issued December 19, 2011, regarding merchant mariners who may be excluded from TWIC requirements. (This is a Word document converted from a .pdf so the formatting gets a little odd at the end of the post.)


Subj: PROCESSING OF MERCHANT MARINER CREDENTIALS (MMC) FOR MARINERS NOT REQUIRING A TRANSPORTATION WORKER IDENTIFICATION CREDENTIAL (TWIC)


Ref: (a) Coast Guard Authorization Act of2010, Public Law 111-281

(b) Title 46, Parts 10, 11 and 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) (c) Title 33, Parts 104 and 105 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)

1. PURPOSE. This policy letter describes both policy and forthcoming regulatory solutions that the Coast Guard is undertaking to implement the requirements of Section 809 of reference (a), which excludes certain mariners from the statutory requirement to obtain and hold a TWIC in order to receive a MMC. In the policy letter solution, the Coast Guard is allowing mariners without a valid TWIC who operate on board vessels that do not have a security plan to acquire and renew a MMC. In the regulatory solution, the Coast Guard is reviewing the MMC and TWIC fee structures, and is considering regulatory changes related to this statutory authorization.

2. ACTION. The National Maritime Center (NMC), all Sectors, Marine Safety Units, and cutters shall ensure compliance with the provisions of this policy letter.

3. DIR ECTIVES AFFECTED. None.

4. BACKGROUND. On October 15, 2010, the President signed the Coast Guard Authorization Act of 2010 ("Act") into law. Prior to the Act, all mariners required to hold a MMC were also required to obtain and hold a valid TWIC. As such, the Coast Guard, through regulations, required that every applicant for an original or renewal MMC obtain a TWIC. Section 809 of the Act, however, permits the Secretary, acting through the Coast Guard, to exempt any mariner who does not require unescorted access to a secure area of a vessel from the requirement to hold a valid TWIC as a precondition of receiving and holding a MMC.

Because the SAFE Port Act of2006 required all mariners to obtain and hold a valid TWIC as a precondition for receiving a MMC, the Coast Guard, to avoid duplicating screening efforts, discontinued some of the screening and information-gathering methods that it previously used in its credentialing process. Those screenings are now done as part of the TWIC crcdentialing process. In order to grant a mariner a MMC, however, the Coast Guard still must ensure that the mariner meets the basic safety and suitability background checks by capturing biographic and biometric information. Thus, the Coast Guard must still use these processes as part of the mariner credentialing process, even if it is no longer necessary that a mariner possess a valid TWIC, because most screening and information-gathering efforts are now integrated into the TWIC application process. Integration of the MMC and TWIC screening requirements is consistent with the long-term goals of the Department of Homeland Security to consolidate basic processes to reduce redundant activity.

In addition, because the credentialing process is funded through user fees, many of which are currently integrated into the TWIC credentialing program, the Coast Guard needs to review and possibly change the fee structure of the MMC credentialing process. The Coast Guard would carry out these reviews and subsequent changes through an administrative rulemaking process, which generally requires a longer timeline than policy changes. In the meantime, the Coast Guard is implementing policychanges to lessen the impact of existing regulations on affected mariners.

5. DISCUSSION. Consistent with Section 809 of the Act, the Coast Guard initially determined that mariners who do not need unescorted access to a secure area designated by a vessel security plan in accordance with reference (c), no longer require a TWIC. However, as discussed above, full implementation of Section 809 may require regulatory changes. Therefore, the Coast Guard has devised a policy letter solution that uses Coast Guard resources and capabilities to lessen the impact while working on a regulatory solution that will address the full scope of Section 809.

a. Policy Letter Solution:

The Coast Guard is allowing mariners without a valid TWIC who operate on board vessels that do not have a security plan to acquire and renew a MMC. Specifically, this policy will apply to mariners who are inactive or not operating under the authority of their credential, as well as those who serve on vessels that are not required to have a vessel security plan. These vessels include:

i. Uninspected passenger vessels of less than 100 gross register tons (GRT); and

ii. Vessels inspected under subchapter T of Title 46 Code of Federal Regulations, except those on international voyages; and

iii. Towing vessels not involved in towing barges inspected under 46 CFR

subchapters D, I or O, and

iv. Towing vessels involved in fleeting, docking, or ship assist as excepted in Title 33 CFR, Section 104.105(a)(ll).

Mariners on the vessels described above will be permitted to renew an existing credential without submitting proof of holding a valid TWIC. The Coast Guard will implement policies, described below, which will enable these mariners to acquire a MMC without having to make two trips to a TWIC enrollment center.

However, mariners who are being issued an initial MMC, or who never held a TWIC, will need to enroll for a TWIC at a TWIC enrollment center. They will also have to pay all applicable fees associated with getting a TWIC. This is required because the TWIC enrollment center is the only place where the Coast Guard can obtain biometric information (fmgerprints) from the applicant. The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) will also continue to conduct all screenings associated with the TWIC, which the Coast Guard uses for issuance of a MMC. However, the mariners described above in paragraph (5a.i) -(5a.iv) will not be required to return to the TWIC enrollment center to pick up their TWIC as a precondition for receiving their initial MMC.

Other mariners renewing their MMC, who do not require a TWIC, may skip the TWIC enrollment process and apply for a MMC directly with a Regional Examination Center (REC), in accordance with Title 46 CFR, Section 10.209. Ifthe mariner chooses to do this, the criminal background data will not be available and the safety and suitability "background check" conducted by the NMC will be name-based. If the mariner chooses this option, he/she will need to affirmatively indicate that they do not desire a TWIC and that they understand that name-based processing could significantly delay processing. A sample statement may be found at: www.uscg.mil.nmc/.

In addition, mariners who are renewing their MMC, and do not require a TWIC, may still choose to enroll for a TWIC at a TWIC enrollment center and pay applicable fees. This approach will ensure that the mariner's fingerprints, photograph, and proof of U.S. citizenship, or nationality with proof of legal resident status (if applicable), are efficiently transmitted to the NMC. The mariner will still be required to pay all applicable fees associated with applying for a TWIC. However, the mariner will not be required to return to the enrollment center and pick up the TWIC. Mariners who do not return to the enrollment center will not be issued a TWIC, and must follow the applicable TSA procedures if they desire a TWIC in the future.

Finally, the Coast Guard will adjust its policy when conducting inspections on the type of vessels described above. While conducting inspections, the Coast Guard currently requires that all mariners produce a valid TWIC. When inspecting the vessels described above, the Coast Guard will change its enforcement policies so that a mariner who does not hold a TWIC or holds an expired TWIC, but a current MMC, will not be considered in violation of the applicable regulations.

b. Regulatory Solution:

As discussed above, the Coast Guard is in the process of considering regulatory changes to reflect the appropriate fee structure for mariners impacted by section 809 of the Act. Specifically, the Coast Guard is considering a regulatory project that would propose to adjust a portion of the MMC fees to compensate these mariners for costs associated with enrolling for a TWIC. The Coast Guard is still in the development process for that regulation, and intends to complete the rule in accordance with the timeline set forth in the Unified Agenda of Regulatory and Deregulatory Actions (found at www.Reglnfo.gov). As part of the rulemaking, the Coast Guard is exploring possible measures to best implement Section 809. The Coast Guard welcomes stakeholder input into this process, and intends to seek and respond to public comments on the regulation. Until such a regulation becomes effective, the existing MMC and TWIC fee structures remain in place.


6. PROCEDURES. Mariners, who fall into the categories listed in paragraph (5.a) above, and who seek a MMC without first obtaining a TWIC, shall follow this process. Coast Guard enforcement procedure changes are also included in this section:

a. Procedures for mariners seeking an MMC. Mariners who do not require unescorted access to a vessel with a security plan should include a written statement that they do not require a TWIC with their application for a MMC. A sample statement may be found at: www.uscg.miVnmc/.

i. Mariners seeking their initial MMC, or those who have not previously obtained a TWIC, will still be required to apply for a TWIC at a TWIC enrollment center before applying for a MMC. These Mariners need not return to the enrollment center to collect the physical TWIC card.

ii. Mariners seeking to renew their MMC and who hold an expired TWIC may either:

(1) Enroll for a TWIC at any TWIC enrollment center. These mariners need not return to the enrollment center to collect the physical TWIC card; or

(2) Directly apply to a REC to renew their MMC. If applicants choose this option,

the Coast Guard will conduct a name-based safety and suitability check of the

individual.

b. The Coast Guard will exercise its enforcement discretion by not including the absence of a valid TWIC as a reason to pursue suspension or revocation action against an MMC. This policy, however, will only apply to mariners serving aboard the following vessel types:

i. Uninspected passenger vessels of less than 100 gross register tons (GRT); and

ii. Vessels inspected under subchapter T of Title 46 Code of federal Regulations, except those on international voyages; and

iii. Towing vessels not involved in towing barges inspected under 46 CFR

subchapters D, I or O; and

iv. Towing vessels involved in fleeting, docking, or ship assist.

c. Inactive Mariners. Mariners who are inactive, or not operating under the authority of their credential for long periods of time, are not required to obtain a TWIC.

7. DISCLAIMER. This guidance is not a substitute for applicable legal requirements, nor is in itself a rule. It is not intended to, nor does it impose legally-binding requirements on any party. It represents the Coast Guard's current implementation strategy on this topic and may assist industry, mariners, the general public, and the Coast Guard, as well as other Federal and state regulators, in applying statutory and regulatory requirements. You can use an alternative approach for complying with these requirements if the approach satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.

8. This policy will remain in effect until cancelled.


9. Questions or concerns regarding this policy may be directed to Commandant (CG- 5434) at (202) 372-1208 or emailed to CG543@uscg.mil.