On December
15 2015, the Department of Homeland Security issued its Semiannual Regulatory
Agenda. As Dennis Bryant so aptly puts it, “this agenda is aspirational in
nature.” This means DHS hopes that the given timetables will be met. Below is
MTSA-related information from the Agenda, with my comments. The full agenda can
be found at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-12-15/pdf/2015-30621.pdf
Updates to
Maritime Security
Abstract:
The Coast Guard proposes certain additions, changes, and amendments to 33 CFR,
subchapter H. Subchapter H is comprised of parts 101 through 106. Subchapter H
implements the major provisions of the Maritime Transportation Security Act of
2002 (MTSA). This rulemaking is the first major revision to subchapter H. The
proposed changes would further the goals of domestic compliance and international
cooperation by incorporating requirements from legislation implemented since
the
original
publication of these regulations, such as the Security and Accountability for
Every (SAFE) Port Act of 2006, and including international standards such as
Standards of Training, Certification & Watchkeeping
security training. This rulemaking has international interest because of the
close relationship between subchapter H and the International Ship and Port
Security Code (ISPS).
NPRM
.................. 07/00/16
Comments: At
this point, I can’t speculate when this update will be issued, or how outdated
it will be when it finally comes out. It’s
obvious to MTSA practitioners that an update needs to be made. Absent this
update, industry and regulators end up operating from NVICs and PACs and policy
letters and other documents, not an ideal situation from either
an industry or a regulator’s point of view. PACs and letters under CF-FAC
signature aren’t regulations. They lack the industry comment that is an
integral part of the regulatory process. The regulatory process seems to have
evolved into a process too cumbersome for today’s fast moving workplace.
Seafarers’
Access to Maritime Facilities
Abstract:
This regulatory action will implement section 811 of the Coast Guard
Authorization Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111–281), which requires the owner/operator
of a facility regulated by the Coast Guard under the Maritime Transportation
Security Act of 2002 (Pub. L. 107–295) (MTSA) to provide a system that enables
seafarers and certain other individuals to transit between vessels moored at
the facility and the
facility
gate in a timely manner at no cost to the seafarer or other individual. Ensuring
that such access through a facility is consistent with the security requirements
in MTSA is part of the Coast Guard’s Ports, Waterways, and Coastal Security
(PWCS) mission.
The timetable on this rule is:
NPRM .................. 12/29/14
NPRM Comment
Period Reopened…05/27/15
NPRM Comment
Period End…07/01/15
Final Rule
............ 02/00/16
Comments: I would not be surprised to see this final
rule issued in first quarter 2016. This regulation will (almost certainly) require
action on the part of all MTSA facilities, including a new FSP section. Interesting
example of a narrowly-focused regulation that sped through the process, despite
an extended comment period. We need to keep in mind, however, the many Coast
Guard actions that preceded this reg.
Transportation
Worker Identification Credential (TWIC); Card Reader Requirement
Concerning the
TWIC Reader rule (Transportation Worker Identification Credential (TWIC); Card
Reader Requirement) the Agenda states: Regulatory Plan: This entry is Seq. No.
62 in part II of this issue of the Federal Register.
Comment:
There is no Part II to this issue of the FR, so I am assuming that this is just
one more puzzling aspect of the TWIC
program.
No comments:
Post a Comment